Twitter Pitching: Hard Numbers from #PitMad by Dan Koboldt

twitter pitch

Twitter Pitching: Hard Numbers from #PitMad by Dan Koboldt

Last week, hundreds of aspiring authors took on a new challenge: pitching their completed manuscripts in 140 characters or less. The event was called #PitMad; the premise is fairly simple: throughout the day, authors tweet a brief pitch for their manuscripts under a common hashtag. Agents and editors monitor the feed, and favorite the pitches that’d they’d like to see as a query or submission.

Tweets can’t exceed 140 characters. The hashtag, readership level (YA, NA, etc.) and genre codes take up 10-12 characters or more. So really, we’re talking about summarizing an entire novel’s character(s), conflict, and stakes in about 130 characters. That’s hard to do, especially in a way that’s coherent and intriguing.

The PitMad Dataset

Because it’s on Twitter (and drew wide participation), the contest also provided a good opportunity for data mining. As a working scientist I couldn’t resist the temptation to learn about my fellow authors en masse by analyzing the feed. Here you’ll find my analysis of 6,500 tweets from the Twitter feed.

For the sake of a clean dataset, I required:

That the user had at least 10 followers

That the tweet contained a tag for readership level (YA, MG, NA, PB, or adult) and/or genre (UF, SF,  etc.).

That the #PitMad tag was located near the start or end of the tweet.

These steps helped remove the spam, the extensive non-pitch discussion about PitMad, comments from agents/editors, etc. It also removed a fair number of tweets (~1,500) that might very well have been pitches, but lacked age/genre tags, so keep that in mind. In the end I had 4,302 tweeted pitches from 709 unique Twitter users.

Age Level: YA Predominates


First, a breakdown by readership level of the work being pitched. Technically, this pitch contest was open to all age levels and genres. Because Brenda Drake runs this contest, however, we should probably expect a Young Adult (YA) bias. A quick look at the pie chart confirms this: 55% of pitches were for YA novels. The other categories were roughly equal: adult (15%), new adult (11%), middle grade (10%), and picture book (9%).

The slight excess of adult relative to other non-YA categories is probably an artifact, because while parsing the twitter feeds, I automatically assigned certain genre tags to adult (e.g. women’s fiction) if no other age tag was provided. Not shown in the pie chart were comic book (CB) works that represented <1% of pitches.

Pitches by Genre: Fantasy & Sci-Fi Rule


Breaking down the pitches by genre is probably a more useful exercise for aspiring authors: it gives an idea of the competition. Overall, urban fantasy was the most prevalent genre, followed by science fiction and then fantasy. Together these three genres accounted for over 60% of pitches. Romance (9%) and paranormal (6%) were the most common after that, followed by LGBT, thriller, historical, and women’s fiction.

Literary fiction and mysteries were the least-prevalent of the genres that I parsed out, which demonstrates the participant bias as well as anything. These are both genres with huge numbers of aspiring authors… just not in the #PitMad contest. I also broke down genres for the most popular reading level (YA) in a separate pie chart, and here the distribution was more broad, with urban fantasy and sci-fi leading the pack (both at 27%).



Tweet Rates, Spamming, and the Top Tweeters


As a participant in this contest, I can tell you that it’s hard to resist the urge to pitch too often. Suddenly you see the dream agent on there, and you want to make sure he/she sees your pitch! At the same time, you don’t want to come across as desperate. The unofficial rule of thumb was 1-2 times per hour, and if you look at the distribution of pitch frequencies, nearly all participants kept to that. There were no “bad apples” who were pitching every five minutes, at least from my analysis. T

That said, when #PitMad began trending on Twitter in the U.S., the hashtag quickly attracted its share of spammers. They were a nuisance, nothing more. If anything, they’re simply more evidence of just how popular the event was.

Agent and Editor Picks

I’d love to tell you that dozens of agents and editors were visibly hitting “favorite” on well-written pitches left and right. But let’s remember that these are busy people, most of whom are currently swamped with New Year’s resolution submissions and holiday catch-up. In fairness, there were thousands of tweets to read. If I looked away from the feed for a minute, it seemed like another 75 or 100 tweets had shown up.

That said, there were agents who generously gave time to participate. I pseudo-randomly chose five agents from different agencies. WIth just a *little* bit of Twitter stalking the day after the contest, I could determine just how many pitches some of them had favorited:

Laura Bradford, Bradford Literary: 1

Pam van Hylckama, Foreword Literary: 13

Lindsay Ribar, Greenburger Associates: 3

Carly Watters, P.S. Literary Agency: 7

Eddie Schneider, JABberwocky Literary: 22

Together, these agents picked 46 pitches as their favorites. Even assuming that there were no overlaps, with my estimate of 709 bona-fide author participants, the odds of success with these agents were around 6.5%.

That might seem depressing at first blush, but remember that getting a favorite (or not) is not necessarily a reflection of the quality of your work. There were lots of good pitches that didn’t get a favorite, at least that I saw. Literary agents must be selective, even in free-for-all contests such at these. They might not represent your genre, they might have another client with a similar book; you just never know.

Attracting the interest of an agent was not the only good outcome possible from this contest and others like it. Participants who gained some new Twitter followers, made friends with other writers, improved pitching skills, or just had fun should consider it a win.

About the Author


Dan Koboldt (@DanKoboldt) works in genetics, writes science fiction, and tries not to mix up the two.

Author: Brenda Drake

New York Times bestselling author of Thief of Lies (Library Jumpers #1), Guardian of Secrets (Library Jumpers #2), Touching Fate (Fated Series #1), and Cursing Fate (Fated Series #2) available now, creator of #PitchWars, #PitchMadness, and #PitMad, fueled by coffee and Goldfish crackers (but not together), and represented by Peter Knapp with The Park Literary Group. @brendadrake

Share This Post On


  1. Wow! Thanks for taking the time to not only do this, but present it as well. 709 unique “pitchers”. Interesting, indeed.

    Post a Reply
  2. Wow that is pretty cool. I have to say Pitmad was my first and I had a great time reading other author pitches as well as writing my own. Thanks for the stats. 🙂

    Post a Reply
  3. You mentioned that the YA genres were made I to a pie chart. As a contemporary YA writer I’d love to see what I’m up against here.

    Post a Reply
  4. This is very cool information – thanks! It’s both awesome and terrifying to see how many other people write YA SciFi, haha.

    Post a Reply
  5. Thanks a million for doing this, Dan. Glad I’m not an agent. I saw dozens of pitches (well, almost) that I would have favorited and would like to have on my bookshelves. Hope some of them go forward…

    Post a Reply
  6. Awesome, thanks so much for taking the time to put this together. Interesting reading! 🙂

    Post a Reply
  7. I love seeing the info like this, so I’m glad someone has the know-how and willingness to do it for those of us who are less mathematically inlined. Thanks, Dan!

    Post a Reply
  8. I feel like a runner before a race. #pitmad will be fun, I’m sure. I wonder if there are any stats on #pitmad favorites. Are they agented? Did they publish? Maybe you can point me to a blog post on that. Thanks Dan. See you tomorrow.

    Post a Reply


  1. Agent and Editor Query Links: Obsession, Misery and Laughs | Mayra Cuevas, Writer - […] Its not enough that you have to write a one page query letter, and a two page synopsis… Now…
  2. Writing Competition, Craft, and Cold Reality - Dan Koboldt - […] saw the article on statistics of querying literary agents or my guest post with Brenda Drake about hard numbers…
  3. Breakdown of New Leaf Literary's #NLpitchperfect - Dan Koboldt - […] API, I can pull down all tweets for any hashtag during a certain window. As I’ve done previously for…
  4. 59 Pitching with Dan Koboldt | The Kingdoms of Evil - […] #Pitmad […]
  5. 9 Ways to Get Ready for #SFFpit - Dan Koboldt - […] last 10 years for hints of what he or she may be looking for. You could also go back…
  6. Breakdown of the First #SFFpit - Dan Koboldt - […] that young adult pitches predominated, accounting for 44% of pitches. This is something we saw in Brenda Drake’s #PitMad…
  7. A Statistical Approach to Twitter Pitching | No More Dead Parents - […] I’ve erred on the side of completeness, so this will be a long post. For more helpful information, check…
  8. Writing in 2014 - Dan Koboldt - […] catch the eye of a literary agent. I persuaded Brenda to let me do a guest post with a breakdown…
  9. The Art of #PitMad | Mara Burke - […] Success Stories How #PitMad Helped Me Get a Literary Agent (with tips!) Twitter Pitching: Hard Nubers (with pie […]
  10. #DVpit and the Phenomenon of Twitter Pitch Events - YA Interrobang - […] allowed to retweet and comment their opinions. In a January 2014 run of #PitMad, there were over 6,500 tweets…

Leave a Reply